Back to Briefing

SEC v. Kalshi: Political Event Contracts Case

The SEC is challenging Kalshi's attempt to offer political event contracts, arguing they constitute illegal gambling. This landmark case could determine the future of prediction markets in the United States.

Summary sources:Reuters
What Changed
  • DC Circuit Court of Appeals granted emergency stay pending appeal Court Filing
  • Kalshi filed response brief arguing markets serve public interest Legal Brief
  • SEC requests expedited briefing schedule Motion Filing
  • Industry groups file amicus briefs supporting Kalshi Court Document

Key Facts

Jurisdiction:
DC Circuit, Federal
Status:active
First reported:Nov 1, 2023
Updated:Jan 22, 2026
Coverage: 15 sources | Primary docs: 3
Primary Documents
3

Kalshi Complaint Against CFTC

PACER | Nov 1, 2023 | 1:23-cv-03257
complaint
View

District Court Order Granting Summary Judgment

PACER | Jan 5, 2024 | 1:23-cv-03257
order
View

SEC Emergency Stay Motion

PACER | Jan 10, 2024 | 24-5033
motion
View
Timeline
Jan 14, 2024Ruling
DC Circuit grants emergency stay

The DC Circuit Court of Appeals granted the SEC's emergency motion for a stay pending appeal.

Jan 12, 2024Filing
Kalshi files opposition to stay

Kalshi filed its opposition brief arguing that the stay would cause irreparable harm.

Jan 10, 2024Filing
SEC files emergency stay motion

The SEC filed an emergency motion requesting a stay pending appeal.

Jan 5, 2024Ruling
District court rules for Kalshi

Judge ruled that the CFTC exceeded its authority.

Dec 15, 2023Enforcement
SEC issues enforcement action
Coverage (15 sources)
Related Stories